The Wall Street Journal doesn’t report on crypto — it hunts it.
First CZ, now Zach Witkoff & @worldlibertyfi.
Same playbook:
Anonymous sources, twisted quotes, and zero accountability.
Let’s unpack the latest smear job.
Remember how WSJ went after CZ for months?
Article after article, all filled with unnamed sources and wild speculation.
It didn’t matter that Binance was driving global adoption — they wanted a villain.
Now it’s @ZachWitkoff turn.
WSJ just published a hit piece claiming he called the President his “godfather.”
Never happened. Zach’s Jewish.
No godparents. But accuracy isn’t their concern — narrative is.
WSJ didn’t name a single source. Again.
Just like with CZ.
No proof, no on-chain data, no real research — just vague fear-mongering aimed at the people building the future of finance.
Meanwhile, @worldlibertyfi is delivering.
$USD1 is now listed on Binance, no small feat.
It’s backed 1:1, audited, custody with BitGo, and managed by Fidelity.
From $130M to $2.1B+ in market cap. 7th largest stablecoin.
They’re targeting real-world utility too — $USD1 was used in a $2B transaction with UAE-based MGX.
This isn’t vaporware.
It’s finance being rebuilt from the ground up. Transparent. Compliant. Scalable.
So why the attacks?
Because legacy media doesn’t control this narrative.
The gatekeepers are watching Web3 take shape without their permission — and it terrifies them.
They smeared CZ, and now they’re trying the same with Zach.
But crypto has grown up.
We remember who builds and who breaks.
And we stand with builders.
If WSJ wants to stay relevant, maybe they should start naming sources and reporting facts — instead of throwing darts at the future and hoping something sticks.
